> Syntax independent - MCIs - Messages > Details > Representations
Syntax Independent Components

Implementation Related Components

Message Content Inventory Archived, and was part of release :
Identifier : M9102 - Description d'un intervenant, agrément expert / Beschrijving betrokkene, goedkeuren expert - (As in Community MIG's - Divers : Communication des agréments des experts / Diversen : Mededeling van erkenningen van experten)
Sender : Insurer
Receiver : Broker
Status : 3 - Version : 1
Seq. n° n
u
d
(*)
Data element
Code list
Usage
Mandatory
Conditional
Optional (**)
Condition(s)
TB2 UN/EDIFACT representation
TB2 XML and JSON representation (***)
Indicator
Identifier
Version
10  
Description d'un intervenant
No
-
-
Mand.
 
XEH+91+1+9102+x--x+x--x++x--x+x--x' 
 
20  
Nom officiel
No
-
-
Option.
 
NME+001+x--x' 
OfficialName NameDetail LastName 
30  
Adresse - rue
No
-
-
Option.
 
ADR+002+x--x 
OfficialAddress AddressDetail StreetName 
40  
Adresse - numéro de maison
No
-
-
Option.
 
ADR+002+:x--x 
OfficialAddress AddressDetail HouseNumber 
50  
Adresse - numéro de boîte
No
-
-
Option.
 
ADR+002+::x--x 
OfficialAddress AddressDetail BoxNumber 
60  
Adresse - code postal
No
-
-
Option.
 
ADR+002++x--x 
OfficialAddress PostalCode 
70  
Adresse - localité
No
-
-
Option.
 
ADR+002+++x--x 
OfficialAddress CityName 
80  
Date de début
No
-
-
Option.
 
DTM+041:x--x:001' 
PeriodStartDate 
90  
Date de fin
No
-
-
Option.
 
DTM+022:x--x:001' 
PeriodEndDate 
100  
Numéro d'agrément de l'expert
No
-
-
Option.
 
RFF+041:x--x' 
ExpertApprovalReference 
110  
Numéro de téléphone privé
No
-
-
Option.
 
COM+001:x--x' 
PrivateTelephoneCommID CommunicationChannelNumber 
120  
Langue de communication
Yes
3
Option.
 
ATT+A10C+x--x' 
LanguageCode 
130  
Description d'un intervenant
No
-
-
Mand.
 
XET+91' 
 

(*) n u d : new / updated / deleted since previous version.

(**) Usage: The indications Mandatory / Conditional / Optional are to be understood in respect of the actual level of the Data element:
  example given; some party data-set as a whole can be optional, while, if present, the party's name within that party data-set can be mandatory.

Remark: in UN/Edifact, "Mandatory / Conditional" are notions used within the standard. And within edi-guides (a refinement of a standard) the "Conditional" can become "Required / Optional / Dependent / Advised / Not used". Ideally we should implement the same ideas.

(***) Remark: In 2020 things evolved into another "approach A" and then yet another "approach B" - It is that "appoach B" which you see here - That "approach B" is the basis of the EDIMERX development.
In TB2-XML "Namespace 2018" (as well as in eEG7-UN/CEFACT), things were/are structurally different.
EDIMERX is supporting the transition from Edifact (messages) to JSON (API's).
The so-called "Business API's" are what comes next / after such transition-phase - and there things will be structurally differrent again.