![]() |
Message Content Inventory |
Identifier : M0104ANN - Contrat, avenant - (Avenant d'annulation) - Approved , and is part of release 201801 - ( TB2-UN/Edifact MIG : Fr / Nl ) - ( TB2-XML : added info ) ( Additional information is present below the details-table ) |
Version : 3 Status : 2 |
Seq. n° | n u d (*) |
Data element | Code list |
Usage Mandatory Conditional Optional (**) |
Condition(s) |
TB2-UN/EDIFACT representation (including comments) |
||
Indicator |
Identifier |
Version |
||||||
10 |
Message issuing date and time
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
XEH+01+2+0104+++domain ++++yyyymmddhhmm +E1' (=X916 and =X918) (domain is mandatory)
|
||
20 |
Message content inventory identifier
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
XEH+01+2+0104+++domain ++++yyyymmddhhmm +E1:::M0104ANN' (=X943)
|
||
30 | u |
Message content inventory version
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
XEH+01+2+0104+++domain ++++yyyymmddhhmm +E1:::M0104ANN:3' (=X944)
|
|
40 |
Contrat
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
XEH+01+2
|
||
50 | u |
Nature du document
|
Yes
|
6
|
Mand.
|
Mandatory and with value 6
|
GIS+EW05+6
|
|
60 |
Date d'annulation
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
DTM+002
|
||
70 |
Numéro de police
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
RFF+001
|
||
80 |
Numéro d'avenant
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
RFF+002
|
||
90 |
GUID (Globally Unique IDentifier) du message, sera référencé par le(s) document(s) annexe(s)
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Cond.
|
Mandatory when added documents are sent.
|
RFF+084
|
|
100 |
Motif d'annulation
|
Yes
|
4
|
Mand.
|
ATT+EW01+x--x
|
|||
110 | u |
Origine de la résiliation
|
Yes
|
2
|
Option.
|
ATT+A314+x--x
|
||
120 |
Etat de l'acceptation de la nouvelle affaire ou du projet
|
Yes
|
2
|
Option.
|
ATT+A055+x--x
|
|||
130 |
Nombre de documents annexes
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Cond.
|
Mandatory when added documents are sent.
|
QTY+134
|
|
140 |
Assureur
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
PTY+006
|
||
150 | u |
Assureur - Numéro FSMA
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
PTY+006+x--x:006
|
|
160 |
Intermédiaire
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
PTY+002
|
||
170 | u |
Intermédiaire - Numéro FSMA
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
Since 15/7/2017 the FSMA no longer attributes such number
|
PTY+002+x--x:006
|
180 | u |
Intermédiaire - Identifiant de l'intermédiaire aupres de la compagnie
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
PTY+002++x--x:002
|
|
190 |
Intermédiaire - Référence producteur
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Mand.
|
PTY+002 - RFF+003
|
||
191 | n |
Intermédiaire - Numéro d'entreprise
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
Added as FSMA-broker-id abandoned 15/7/2017
|
PTY+002 - RFF+075:x--x
|
192 | n |
Intermédiaire - Numéro unité d'exploitation
|
No
|
-
|
-
|
Option.
|
Added as FSMA-broker-id abandoned 15/7/2017
|
PTY+002 - RFF+076:x--x
|
(*) n u d : new / updated / deleted since previous version.
(*bis) u : updated : this can be a codelist-version incrementing.
Note that in many, not to say all such cases, the user-community does not await such next release to implement/activate such new codelist-values.
The reasoning is that such added value does not affect the current data-structures and hence is considered easely implementable.
Such reasoning tends to forget how given new codelist-values might not simply affect the data, but also affect the process, which might be more of a problem...
(**) Usage: The indications Mandatory / Conditional / Optional are to be understood in respect of the actual level of the Data element:
example given; some party data-set as a whole can be optional, while, if present, the party's name within that party data-set can be mandatory.
Remark: in UN/Edifact, "Mandatory / Conditional" are notions used within the standard.
And within edi-guides (a refinement of a standard) the "Conditional" can become "Required / Optional / Dependent / Advised / Not used".
Ideally we should implement the same ideas.